borders rotated




'Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit'

St Matthew 28: 19

Charity No. 282910

the church 2 Twitter circle black small Facebook circle black small


I. Definition & Names


(1) This is the crowning service of the Christian Church, the culmination of Christian worship, the summit of Christian experience where devout believers hold intimate communion with their living Lord.  The church through the ages has regarded this sacrament as the supreme act of the communal worship.


(2) Through this sacrament we eat the blessed flesh of our Lord, and drink His precious blood under the form of bread and wine.


(3) It is called:


1. The Holy communion

2. The Lord’s Table

3. The flesh and blood of Christ

4. The Eucharist


II. Types in the Old Testament


(1) The offerings which Melchisedec offered.  For the first and last time in the Old Testament it was said that there were offerings of bread and wine.  "And Melchisedec King of Salem bought forth bread and wine: and he was the priest of the most high God."  (Gen.  14:18) For this reason it was said of our Lord "Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec."  (Heb. 5:6, 10; 7: 17)


(2) The passover which the children of Israel offered on the night of their going out of Egypt, and which they used to offer every year.  "Christ our passover is sacrificed for us;" (1Cor.  5:7) "The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which takes away the sin of the world". (John 1:29)


(3) The "manna" which Israel ate in the wilderness for forty years. "Verily, verily I say onto you.  Moses gave you not that bread (manna) from heaven, but my father giveth you the true bread from heaven".  (John 6:32)


"This is the bread which came down from heaven: not as your fathers did eat manna and are dead: he that eateth of this bread shall live forever". (John 6:58)


III. Institution of the Sacrament


It pleased our Lord to institute this sacrament on a very momentous occasion.  The Evangelists told us that He instituted it at the approach of the passover feast which was considered as the greatest feast of the Jews, and was a type of the sacrifice of Himself.  It was also instituted directly before His death, and on the night of His passion when He was about to give Himself for the life of the world. "The Lord Jesus Christ the same night in which He was betrayed took bread: and when He had given thanks, He broke it, and said, Take eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me.  After the same manner also He took the cup, when He had supped saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me". (1 Cor.  11:23-25)


IV. The Visible Sign


There are two visible signs in this sacrament: (1) the bread and wine (2) the service of mass, especially those players through which the Holy Spirit descends upon the bread and wine changing them into the body and blood of the Lord.


(1) The bread should be made of pure wheat, and should be leavened, because the sacrament was instituted at a time when all the Jews were using leavened bread.


The law ordered that Israel should feast on the evening of the 14th day of the month, and begin to eat unleavened bread at the time of eating the Passover.  "And ye shall keep it up till the 14th day of the same month: and the whole assembly of the congregation of Israel shall kill it in the evening.  In the first month, on the 14th day of the month at even, ye shall eat unleavened bread, until the one and twentieth day of the month at even.  Seven days shall there being no leaven found in your houses, for whosoever eateth that which is leavened, even that soul shall be cut off from the congregation of Israel, whether he be a stranger or born in the land" (Exodus 12:6, 18, 19)


But the sacrament was instituted on the 13th day of the month because of the following reasons:


1. It was expressly said that it was "before the feast of the Passover". (John 13:1)


2. The next morning, after laying hands on Jesus, it was said the Jews were preparing themselves to keep the feast.  "Then lead they Jesus from Caiaphas unto hall of Judgement: and it was early, and they themselves went not into the judgement hall, least they should be defiled, but that they might eat the Passover". (John 18:28).


"When Pilate therefore heard that saying he bought Jesus forth, and sat down in the judgment seat in a place that is called the pavement, but in the Hebrew, Gabbatha.  And it was the preparation of the Passover, and about the sixth hour: and he saith to the Jews behold your King."  (John 19:13, 14)


3. They were preparing themselves for the feast even after the death of Christ on the cross, "The Jews therefore because it was the preparation, that the bodies should not remain upon the cross on the sabbath day (for that sabbath day was a high day), besought Pilate that their legs might be broken and that they might be taken away."  (John 19:31)


This shows that the preparations for the feast was on Friday, and that the feast was on Saturday, the following day, which began as is the custom for the Jews on Friday evening.  For this reason it was said of that Saturday that it was a high (great) day.


4. It was the custom that the governor should release unto the people at the feast time a prisoner whom they liked.  And Barabbas was released accordingly on Friday.  The prisoner was generally released before the feast, in order to keep it with his household.


5. It was said of Judas Iscariot that "after the sop Satan entered into him.  Then Jesus said unto him, That thou doest do quickly.  For some of them thought because Judas had the bag, that Jesus said unto him, Buy those things that we need against the feast; or that he should give something to the poor."  (John 13:27-29)


This shows that on Thursday the feast had not yet begun, because one has to buy things for the feast before that and not on the same day or after.


But the Roman Catholic Church teaches that the bread should be unleavened, because it was said: "Now the first day of the feast of unleavened bread the disciples came to Jesus, saying unto Him, where wilt Thou that we prepare for Thee to eat the passover And He said, Go into the city to such a man, and say unto him, The master saith My time is at hand; I will keep the passover at thy house with my disciples.  And the disciples did as Jesus appointed them; and they made ready the passover."  (Matt 26:17-19)


As it is clear from the previous verses that the feast was on Saturday, it is impossible to find a verse contradicting the other.  The reason for this seeming contradiction is that the feast was on Saturday, and the lamb was to be slain on the evening of Friday (the 14th day).  The 14th day is called the passover, and the unleavened seven days where to begin at the evening of this 14th day.  The Jews used to consider the day beginning from the evening of the previous day; thus Friday begins from Thursday evening.  When St Matthew and St Mark said that the Lord instituted this sacrament on the first day of the feast of unleavened bread, they meant to say that He instituted it on Friday (which begun on the evening of Thursday) the feast of the Passover, which was to be followed by seven days of unleavened bread and which was often called the first day of the unleavened bread (Luke 22:7)


6. Moreover, most commentators affirm that this sacrament was instituted on the 13th day of the month, ie before the passover, or rather before the first day of unleavened bread.


a. John Chrysostom says: "The Evangelist is saying ‘ Then came the day of unleavened bread when the passover must be killed’ does not mean that it had already come but that it was at hand, and refers to the beginning of that day, because every day begins at the previous evening."


b. In interpreting Matt 26:17 "Now the first day of the feast of unleavened bread the disciples came to Jesus saying unto him, where wilt Thou that we prepare for Thee to eat the passover?"  the Pulpit Commentary states (P. 519): "we have arrived at the Thursday in the Holy week, Nisan 13th.  The festival actually begun at sunset of the 14th, which we called the day of preparation, because the lambs of the feast were slain in the afternoon of that day, preparatory to their being eaten before the morning of the 15th.  Domestic preparation begun on the 13th, hence this was considered (the first day of unleavened bread)."


c. And Adam Clarke, in his commentary states: "As the feast of unleavened bread did not begin till the day after the passover, the 15th day of the month, this could not have been properly the first day of that feast; but as the Jews began to eat unleavened bread on the 14th (EX.  12:18), this day was often termed the first day of unleavened bread.  The evangelists used it in this sense, and call even the paschal day by this name.  See Mark 14:12; Luke 22: 7 "


7. In addition to all this it is worth mentioning that the Bible states in every place that the Lord "took bread and blessed it."  (Matt 26:26); (Mark 14:22; Luke 22: 19; 1 Cor.  11: 23; etc etc)


Whenever the word "bread" is used, it means leavened bread, i.e. ordinary bread.


It was never said in the Bible that He took unleavened bread.


(2) And the wine should be:


1. Very pure,


2. The fruit of the vine.  "And he took the cup, and gave thanks and gave it to them, saying Drink ye all of it; for this is my blood of the new covenant, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.  But I say unto you, I will not drink henceforth of this fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it new with you in my Fathers kingdom."  (Matt.  26:27-29)


3. Mixed with water, because the Lord thus used it (Orders of the Apostles 8:22) and because it resembles, in this way, the blood and water that came out of the Lord's side.  (John 19, 32-34)


V. The Invisible Grace


(1) We partake of the flesh and blood of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.


(2) We get the spiritual food which helps us to grow in grace and in the knowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. "And Jesus said unto them, I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall never hunger, and he that believeth on me shall never thirst.  For my flesh is meat indeed and my blood is drink indeed". (John 6:35, 55).


(3) We receive remission of sins.  "And He took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying.  Drink ye all for it, for this is my blood of the new covenant, which is shed for many for the remission of sins". (Matt. 26:27, 28)


(4) We abide in Christ, and Christ abides in us.  "He that eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him". (John 6:56)


(5) We get Holy Fellowship; with Christ Himself, with our fellow worshippers and with all the Church on earth, with the saints around the throne of God, with the angels and archangels and all the company of heaven.  The Holy Communion tells us that God's salvation comes to us in fellowship with our fellow men.  This is not, truly understood, an individual act of worship, but the common meal of the family of God, our father.


"For we being many are one bread, and one body: for we are all partakers of that one bread". (1 Cor. 10:17)


(6) We are given true life in this world.  Unless the branch abides in the vine, it cannot have life. "Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and to drink His blood, ye have no life in you.  He that eateth me, even he shall live by me". (John 6:53, 57)


(7) We are given eternal life.  "Whosorver eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.  He that eateth of this bread shall live forever." (John 6: 54, 58)


VI. The Change of Bread and Wine


We believe that, after prayer, the bread and wine are spiritually changed into the body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ.  For this reason we do not look at mere bread and mere wine on the altar, but we truly look at the body and blood of the Lord under the forms of bread and wine.


The church Fathers said in this respect:


"We believe that our Lord Jesus is present in this sacrament, not in type or by way of granting His grace, as is the case of other sacraments, but He is truly and actually present.  For this reason the bread is changed after prayer into the Lord's very body which was born at Bethlehem from the Virgin Mary, baptised at Jordan, suffered, buried and rose from the dead.  Likewise, the wine is changed into the very blood of Lord which was shed on the cross".

3. And the seventh Council asserts that "the unbloody sacrifice which is offered in remembrance of the sufferings of the Saviour and the blessed incarnation was never called - by any one of the Holy Apostles or the forefathers - the form of the Christ's body, neither were they taught to proclaim the same, but they heard Him saying ‘Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink His blood, ye have no life in you'."


"He did not say ‘the form of my body’.  Neither did the Lord nor the Apostles speak of the form of Christ's body and blood, but they spoke of the very body and a very blood.  Whenever they were spoken of as bread and wine this is concerning them before prayer."


(3) The writings of the early fathers.


Clement, Dionisius and Cyril of Alexandria; Macarius and Cyril of Jerusalem; John Chrysostom, Gregory, Basil and many others- all of them affirmed that the bread and wine are spiritually changed after prayer in to the very body and the very blood of the Lord.


Justin and Irenaeus attribute to the Logos the operative power by which the elements become the Body and Blood of Christ.  Clement of Alexandria, Origen, and Athanasius assert that the spiritual content of the Eucharist is identified with the Logos.


This idea finds expression in one of the ancient Egyptian liturgies, when the Logos is invoked to come up on the bread that it may become "the Body of the Logos"  


(4) The writings of the protestants themselves.


1. Calvin, one of their most prominent leaders, said: "If anyone enquire of me respecting  the manna, I shall not be ashamed to acknowledge that it is a mystery too sublime for me to be able to express or even to comprehend; and, to be still more explicit, I rather experience it and understand it.  Here, therefore, without any controversy, I embraced the truth of God, on which I can safely rely.  He pronounces His flesh to be the food, and His blood the drink, of my soul.  I offer my soul to him to be nourished with such aliments."  


2. Martin Luther, the great leader of the protestants, said:  "Christ said, this is my flesh, and we can do nothing better to respect His words."


3. The Scottish Confession of 1560, of the Presbyterian church, says: "So that we confess and undoubtably believe that the faithful, in the right use of the Lords Table, do so eat the body, and drink the blood of the Lord Jesus, that  He remaineth in them, and they in Him; yea, they are so made flesh of His flesh, and bone of His bone."  (The "Holy Communion"  by David Cairns & others P. 75)



VII. The Holy Communion as a Sacrifice


(1) We believe that this sacrament is an unbloody sacrifice offered for our salvation.  This we can prove from the following:


1. When instituting the sacrament, our Lord said: "This is my blood which is given (sacrifice) for you. This cup is the new covenant in my blood, which is shed for you."  (Luke 22:19, 20)


2. St Paul, in his comparison between the sacrifices and altar of the gentiles, and the Christian sacrifices and altar (1 Cor. 10:18-21) gives the proof that the Holy communion is offered on the altar as a true sacrifice.



3. And in Heb. 13:10 he refers to the Christian altar.


4. This sacrifice of the New Testament was foretold in the Old Testament: "From the rising of the sun even unto the going down of the same my name shall be great among the gentiles and in every place incense shall be offered onto my name, and a pure offering (or 'sacrifice' as in other translations) for my name shall be great among the heathen, saith the Lord of hosts."  (Malachi 1:11)


It is clear that the Prophet speaks ‘ hear about a new sacrifice which had to be offered in the Gospel time.


When interpreting this first, there Pulpit Commentary says:


"The Fathers and mediaeval writers, and many modern commentators, see in this verse a prophecy of the Holy Eucharist, the pure offering commemorative of Christ's sacrifice, which is found in every nation under heaven where the name of Christ's is adored."


5. The Council of Nicaea called the Holy Communion the unbloody sacrifice: "Neither the Lord, nor the Apostles, nor the fathers called the holy unbloody sacrifice a sign, but they always called it the very flesh and the very blood of the Lord."


6. In Ch. 14 of the Didache or teaching of the Twelve Apostles it is said that the worship should be preceded by a confession of sins, "that your sacrifice may be pure."  This sacrifice is identified with "the pure offering" of Malachi 1:11, (The Early History of the Liturgy by J. H. Srawley p.21)


7. All Church Fathers called it sacrifice.  For instance Irenaeus, in his work "Adversus Haereses" written about AD 180, made several references to the Eucharist.  The various titles under which he alludes to eat "Eucharist", "the obligation of the Church", "the new oblation of the new covenant", "the pure sacrifice" (in reference to Mal. 1:11)


("The Early History of the Liturgy" by J.H. Srawley P. 35, 36)


8. When speaking about the Holy Communion in the Anglican Church, one of her men said: "The sacrifice of Christ upon the Cross is made present and contemporary by the consecration of the elements (bread and wine); this is wholly and entirely God's gift of grace to man."  ("The Holy Communion" by David Cairns and others, p.64).


9. In "The Manual of Worship" of the "United Presbyterian Church of North America" it is said (P.81)


"It is a solemn moment when standing at the altar the minister says, Let us pray"


If then there is an altar, there must be a sacrifice.


(2) This sacrifice is the same with that which is offered on the Cross.  John Chrysostom says: "Our great High priest offered the sacrifice which purifies us.  Since then we also offer the same sacrifice."


The differences between this sacrifice and that which was offered on the Cross are:


1. Our Lord offered a visible sacrifice on the cross while in the Holy Communion He offers an invisible one under the form of bread and wine.


2. On the Cross He offered a bloody sacrifice through shedding His blood, in the Holy Communion He offers an unbloody sacrifice, because "knowing that Christ being raised from the dead dieth no more; death hath no more dominion over him."  (Rom. 6:9)


3. On the Cross the sacrifice was offered for all the sacrifice of man once only, and in one place, but the unbloody sacrifice is offered continuously in every place on earth and only for those who receive it in faith.



VIII. Who has the Right to Celebrate this Sacrament


Our Lord gave this right to the Apostles when He told them “This do in my remembrance.” (Luke 22:19) And the Apostles gave it to their successors, the bishops.  But because Christianity was soon spread, the bishops could not go to all towns and villages to celebrate the sacrament.  For this reason they gave the right to the priests.  The deacons can only help the bishops and priests.  The laity are strictly forbidden to celebrate.



IX. Who has the Right to Partake of The Holy Communion


(1) All baptised persons have the right to partake.


(2) It was the custom, in the previous centuries for all believers to take the holy communion  every week, bearing in mind the words of the Lord: “Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink His blood, ye have no life in you.  He that eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood dwelleth in me, and I in him."  (John 6: 53, 56) For this reason it is essential that every Christian should take the holy communion from time to time, and least once or twice or three times a year if not every week.


(3) But before taking the holy communion the believer must prepare himself for it beforehand.  “Let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of the bread, and drink of that cup.  For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord’s body." (Cor. 11: 28, 29)


(4) And as the babies are allowed to receive baptism they should also be allowed to take the holy communion, in order not to be deprived of this food of the Spirit.


(5) And we must take both the body and the blood.  But the Church of Rome gives only the body.  In reply we state the following:


1. When the Lord gave His disciples the holy communion, He gave them both the body and the blood.  More over when giving the cup, He expressly ordered that all of us should drink of it.  "Drink ye all of it."  (Matt. 26:27)


2. Whenever the holy communion is spoken of in the Bible both the body and the blood are mentioned.


3. All the church fathers said that both the body and the blood were given to believers since the first century.


4. Even the Roman Church fathers say that believers used to take both the body and the blood till the 12th century.


5. When the flesh is divided and given to believers, we believe that every part of it, even the smallest part is perfect body of the Lord: and so also is the case with the blood.


We also believe that once the bread and wine are changed they remain to become the flesh and the blood till they are completely consumed.  But some Protestants think that what is left over the Holy communion has been received and can be dispensed as something of no importance.

NEXT BACK communion

The way of the Lord's presence is by changing the bread and wine into His blessed body and precious blood.


But some Protestants say that we take the bread and wine as mere memorial service in remembrance of the Lord's sufferings and death.  In reply we have to refer:


(1) To the Bible.


All of that is mentioned in the Bible regarding this sacrament support our doctrine.


1. The Jews to whom the Lord was speaking about the living bread took His words literally.  When they heard Jesus saying "I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live forever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world," (John 6:51) they began to strive among themselves saying "How can this man give us His flesh to eat?" (v. 52) Had they been mistaken in taking His words literally, the Lord would have told them the true sense which He meant.  But, contrary to this, He began to repeat the same teaching more powerfully and more clearly: "Then Jesus said unto them Verily, verily I say unto you, except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink His blood, ye have no life in you.  Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, have eternal life: and I will raise him up at the last day.  For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed." (v.  53-55)


2. And the disciples also, taking the master's words literally, and being unable to understand the possibility of eating the Lord's flesh and drinking His blood, began to murmur saying "this is a hard saying; who can hear it?"


But the Saviour began to convince them of the reality of that teaching, and said to them: “Doth this offend you?  What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where He was before?"  (v 61. 62)


3. When the Lord gave the Holy Communion to His Disciples He " took bread, and blessed it and broke it, and gave it to the disciples and said, Take eat: this is my body.  And He took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying Drink ye all of it, for this is my blood of the new covenant."  (Matt. 26:26-28)


There was no need for the Lord to speak at that time in parables or proverbs, as it was His last day with them, and He had to open to them all His heart, and speak to them very simple and clear words.  "His Disciples said unto Him Lo, now speakest Thou plainly, and speakest no proverb."  (John 16:26)


4. St. Paul says: "The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ?  The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ?"  (1 Cor. 10:16)


Then He repeats the same words used by the Saviour when He instituted the sacraments.  "For I have received of the Lord which also I deliver unto you, that the Lord Jesus the same night in which He was betrayed took bread and when He had given thanks He broke it, and said Take eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me.  And after the same manner also He took the cup, when he had supped, saying This cup is the new testament in my blood, this do ye is oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me.  Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord unworthy, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord" (1 Cor. 11:23-27)


These are quite clear words showing that whenever we take the holy communion we partake of the body and blood of the Saviour.


(2) To the decisions of the early synods.


1. The Council of Nicaea reported: "We should not look at the bread and cup on the holy table as if they were mere bread and wine, but we must lift up the mind beyond the senses, and perceive by faith that the lamb of God who taketh away the sin of the world rests here, slain by the priests and that they are partaking of the very body of the Lord and His very blood."


2. The 3rd world council held at Ephesus confirmed the message of St Cyril, Patriarch of Alexandra, which ran as follows: "We admit that the only begotten Son of God, our Lord Jesus Christ, died in body, we confess His resurrection and ascension to heavens, and we offer in the churches the unbloody sacrifice.  Thus we approach the blessed sacrament, and we are sanctified when we partake of the blessed body of Jesus Christ our Saviour and His precious blood."

Copyright © 2010 tserhasion. All Rights Reserved I [email protected] I St James Church, Clapton Pond, Hackney, London, United Kingdom, E5 0PD I  phone: 0208 807 5885